Salamander Banner
May 5 2013

Ironing out the kinks in Iron Man

With its recent theatrical release, there’s been a lot of talk about Iron Man and specifically the third movie in the franchise (Iron Man 3 or Three, depending on what you’re watching/reading).

Now, before I go on, a quick warning: SPOILERS AHEAD! Turn back now if ye don’t want the movie secrets revealing.

Right, with all that out of the way, I can go on.

I do sometimes post movie reviews on the blog. If I get time (which I seem to have precious little of these days, and still decreasing) or I’m sufficiently moved, I might write 500 words or so saying what I liked and didn’t like. I won’t provide a star rating (I’ve done that on Twitter occasionally, more just to show my opinion of a film in a nutshell), but my thoughts are for anyone’s consumption.

Iron Man 3 gives me something of a conundrum that I can’t quite figure out. I’ve been mulling this over, off and on, the last few days and my slowly diminishing interest in discussing it were rekindled by a piece I read on IGN citing the apparent split between the reaction of the Iron Man hardcore fan base and the general public (or anyone other than the hardcore) to the movie.

I with the hardcore fans, or some part of me is, but I don’t consider myself one of the them. I really couldn’t care less if the Mandarin wasn’t some Chinese dude with magic rings and all that blah,blah, blah. And I liked what Ben Kingsley did with the role and how Guy Pearce was revealed as the actual Mandarin. No issue with any of that.

I also keep hearing about how Avengers 2 is going to struggle to match the action packed finale of Iron Man 3. Really? I just don’t see it.

I liked Iron Man 3. I really did. But I only liked it. I wanted to love it. And from what I’m reading in the press and on various blog sites, a lot of people did… I mean they really loved it. Some reviewers are even hailing it as the best Marvel movie to date (even better than Captain America, said one individual – this, I really don’t get), certainly the best Iron Man to date.

I can appreciate could story, complex characters and plot twists. I like to be surprised and made to pay attention when something happens I wasn’t expecting. Iron Man 3 has all of these things, right? Yes, it certainly does. So what’s the f*#king problem, I ask myself?

Expectation. That’s the thing. Much like young Pip in the Dickens classic, I did have so very great expectations for this movie. I watched the trailers thinking, ‘Wow, Stark is really going to be put through the ringer here. This will be tough. This is going to be dark.’

Only it wasn’t dark, not remotely. Tony Stark’s anxiety issues, his mental trauma at the events of his near death in space during the battle for New York in the Avengers, were all good character developing stuff and more power to that, but the one thing that really didn’t gel for me with this movie was there wasn’t enough frigging Iron Man. Most of the movie’s running time, Tony spends out of his armour or jumping comically from one suit to the next, whilst poor old War Machine/Iron Patriot flies from one plot twist to another, largely spectating.

I wanted to see Iron Man take on the Mandarin or some of his extremis cronies (as to show off the Mandarin at this point would’ve spoiled one of the twists), get his but kicked in an all mighty battle and then hit rock bottom. Trouble is, Stark never really gets a decent shot at him. He never gets to take him on and full strength and still have his ass handed to him. We never see Stark find a way to triumph over his anxiety and, thus of one heart and mind, beat the spit out of the Mandarin (after revealing the fact that Killian was really the Mandarin all along). He just sort of stops being anxious, busts into Killian’s evil lair/mansion and discovers that Ben Kingsley is the Mandarin aka actor.

It was all a bit weak and lacking in drama for me.

It was disappointing, but still enjoyable, but not as great as it should have been. At least for me, and this is just my opinion so before you think about jumping in and telling me how deluded I am, or how much of a douche I’m being for not loving this movie as much as you do, then please remember that.

And on the subject of the action packed finale that Joss Whedon doesn’t know how he’s going to top with Avengers 2, I say this: You’ve already done it, mate. The first Avengers easily tops it for action and excitement. Let’s just say I don’t get the same joy-joy feeling watching the various faceless Iron Men fight against faceless extremis soldiers as I do watching the Avengers battle the crap out of a, okay then, faceless alien race. It’s just not as cool.

It would’ve been nice to introduce some of these iron armours earlier on in the movie, put names to face almost. Sure, there was some really cool shit in there, but a lot of it was blink and you miss it, or blink and it some now gets overheated by an extremis soldier and shut down (something else that sort of got dropped in at the last minute and was never really addressed).

There’s a lot of story in this movie, and a lot of character development (well for Tony Stark anyway) but not nearly enough action. Barring the Malibu attack chopper scene (which was bloody awesome, by the way, and the film’s stand out action sequence for me), there’s only really the finale which has any actual combat in it. And even during that Tony is out of the suit most of the time or unable to fly due to system failure or some Maguffin. True, the Air Force One escape was ace, but who was Tony rescuing? Just a bunch of faceless White House staffers. Not much tension there, really. Looked impressive though.

So, yes, I have very mixed feelings about Iron Man 3. I cannot hail it as the best Marvel movie ever, that’s just silly. It doesn’t do enough of what a comic book movie should do, supply lots of over the top action and jaw-dropping battles. Remember that incredible sequence in the Avengers where the Heli-carrier is going down and the team have to fight off Hawkeye’s goons and stop the massive ship/flyer/whatever from crashing? Yeah? Awesome wasn’t it. And that was only halfway throw the movie. You’re telling me the finale to Iron Man 3 tops that? It tops the battle in New York that follows it? I can’t see it.

I hope I watch Iron Man 3 and, expectations lowered, I enjoy it much more the second time around. We shall see. For now, for me, it’s a good Marvel movie but certainly not the best.

Rant over.


Apr 6 2013

Latest updates!

Not done one of these for a while. That other mistress of mine (Lady Twitter – man, that just sounds wrong…) has been luring me away with 140 character charms. Oooh.

Ahem.

Apologies.

As Stef is at the Cake and Bake show today, work will finally draw to a close for me on Vulkan Lives. It has been a long, tough road as all full length novel projects are (seriously, I find them completely knackering), but the end is in sight. Of the first draft at least. Then I’ll be sending it off to the jaws of the editors to see what they make of the taste.

In other news, I am on the look out for some BETA readers for my next novel (Salamanders #4 or #5 – I can never remember). It’s something I seldom have time to indulge in but that I know a lot of other authors make use of, that first litmus test with the target audience. Any who, the search is on.

Got a lot of Horus Heresy material coming up over the next few months, more than I’ve ever done, which is really just a confluence of the ideas I’ve been developing over the last ear or two coming to fruition. You might have already seen Gates of Terra. That’s on the BL website now and here’s the link if you haven’t:

http://www.blacklibrary.com/horus-heresy/gates-of-terra-ebook.html

I’ve also got an MP3 audio featuring everybody’s favourite Ultramarine, Aeonid Thiel. It’s called Censure and it’s also going to be released as a CD (before all your digital-phobics get all rowdy and up in arms).

Two novellas are on the cards, both Salamander-based (so it’s all coming at once you XVIII Legion fans): Promethean Sun (the stripped down novella version) and Scorched Earth (the brand new, limited edition novella – and please don’t rail against the fact that it’s limited. It’ll be available on the BL site for a week in a few months, so if you want one you can get one).

I return to 40k after that with a new Salamanders novel to keep me out of trouble and a few side projects. There’s going to be an omnibus of the first three Tome of Fire novels too, plus short stories and some extra material I am currently putting together, including a new short story. A return to Damnos is also on the cards and features very heavily in my upcoming writing schedule. Can’t give you any more details on that though, I’m afraid. I’ve probably said too much already but then who knows what gets spoken about at BL Live etc.

Well that’s everything on the cards for me at the moment. Hope you’re enjoying the output and are looking forward to what’s up next.

Toodle-oo.


Mar 10 2013

Entertain me!

I’ve been thinking about what I can blog about, having once again been lured away by my other social media mistress, Twitter.

I’ve got a few topics ‘in the bank’, as it were. A bit on dwarfs (the Warhammer, not the circus or primordial kind) and a piece on writing in the labyrinth (the intellectual, creative kind not the one with Bowie in as the Goblin King doing his dance, magic dance). They keep glaring at me, these two, from my drafts folder. Well, glare all you like pal, I’m not going down that road yet.

I also considered writing something about the fantastic artwork that’s been released recently on a trio of Horus Heresy projects I’ve been working on (two down, one big ass mutha to go), and genuinely wanted to do that but my Mac wouldn’t play ball with the pictures (that is to say it was being rubbish, or, more likely, Sky Broadband was, and they were taking a freaking dog’s age to download. Bah!).

So, here we are with a back-up topic. It’s all about entertainment and, not wishing to be self centred but, hey, this is my blog and so a certain amount of self centring – that even a word? – is to be expected, specifically my entertainment.

Lately, I’ve been a little big crocked with a dodgy back (it’s bronchitis related, some to do with me almost coughing my ribs apart – read about it on Twitter). I’ve been staying in more than going out (oh yeah, writing a novel to a tight deadline will do that to you too) and so the small screen has become my world as far as entertainment goes.

A while back, I wrote a piece on the blog about damn good television and proceeded to divvy up the shows I watched into discrete categories based on what I thought about their production values, story, acting and so on. I suppose this is the spiritual sequel to that post.

My frustration is this: to the casual observer, it might seem like we’re in a golden age of television. Production values and the greater access and availability (financially speaking) on special effects, plus the fact that lots of Hollywood actors that don’t frequent the silver screen so often are getting in on the act, means TV land has never been rosier. Or has it?

Take Sky Atlantic’s offerings, for instance (oh, and Sky and Fox are totally leading the way as far as great TV is concerned at the moment). Apart from Games of Thrones and Madmen, I can’t think of another show that I really, really look forward to watching on this uber, stellar channel of kings. Arguably, it’s TVs top dog as far as shows are concerned and has shedloads of money it can throw around to get the very best.

Both those aforementioned shows (which are great, in my opinion, combining great story telling, characters and production values together) are back in April, so thank crimminy (still trying to bring it back) for that. But what else? Okay, I’ll confess that Boardwalk Empire is worth putting on a never miss too. Let’s check out the more recent line up of new shows… Vegas. I had high hopes for this and still do enjoy watching it. Dennis Quaid and Michael Chicliss (sp?) are great leads and that guy from the god-awful Terra Nova is pretty good too, but something is missing. I like ‘period’ stuff, and Vegas in the ’60s should be awesome (I loved X-Men: First Class) but it doesn’t seize me like Madmen or GoT does. What else? Well, there’s The Following. Now that show had some promise, aside from Kevin Bacon who isn’t great in it, but has become more and more ridiculous as it’s gone on and now I’m starting to lose patience with it. And if someone doesn’t punch that annoying nanny-turned-nut bag in the face soon I may just switch off in protest.

Sky’s got a pretty big slate at the moment, lots of new stuff or shows that are still in their first season. Unlike Atlantic, this is mainly bubblegum but here’s where they’re winning the war. Arrow, for instance, has grown from a fairly episodic slightly dodgily shot hero show to something with a deeper, more interesting storyline that really draws on some cool, fan-pleasing aspects of the DCU. More of that please.

Admittedly on Sky Living, another show that has surprised and impressed me is Elementary. Holmes’ purists aside, this is a great detective drama and delivered convincingly and entertainingly by Lucy Lui and Johnny Lee Miller.

Switching my gaze to other channels, 5 has the rather silly but still rather good, Person of Interest. Not a big fan of Calviezal (sp?) in this role, he doesn’t quite convince me of his badass credentials with fairly crap fighting skills and a raspy voice, but still it’s very entertaining and the rest of the cast and story telling make up for JC’s shortcomings. Again though, it’s bubblegum.

I look forward to the return of Supernatural, of course I do, but that shows is getting on in years and running short of ideas. I’ll like it but I won’t love and follow it with the same vim and vigour as I did at the show’s creative apex of seasons four and five.

Then there’s True Blood. Let’s face it, this show has always been ridiculous, it’s unashamed about that but I’ve been watching the season 5 (?) rerun on Sky One and it’s just shit. Seriously, I am not sure I can take much more of Sookie Stackhouse’s nonsense. It’s a bit like Ally McBeal in that you really aren’t pulling for the main character at all but are actually much more invested in the secondary ones.

Ripper Street was a nice diversion on the BBC. Really enjoyed that, and our British Broadcasting Corporation should be investing more in shows like this with shorter runs and syndicating the bejesus out of them. That said, even Ripper Street was a little ropey in places but was carried along by strong performances from it’s three male leads. Looking forward to seeing more of that, though.

Currently, my other half loves Nashville and Smash (when it returns), both musical shows like Glee but for adults (less singing in Nashville, admittedly) and both these shows are in the early days on their life so hopefully they’ll continue to develop.

So, why is it I am feeling so jaded? Well, a lot of older shows in their fifth, sixth or successive seasons are showing their age in terms of the plots and characters. I used to love Dexter and that seems to be falling off a cliff as well. Most of these hardy perennials of the TV world jumped the shark long ago (The Following did it in its first season, during episode 3 or 4) and are kind of paddling for dear life. Running out of air and life, methinks (no more mixed metaphors, I promise).

Bubblegum is alive and well, chewy as ever, but the really compelling stuff, the I cannot wait to see it because my world depends on it stuff is tough to find. And it’s tough to see what’s going to replace those shows that once occupied these vaunted positions when they were new and still interesting.

There is one exception, I think, and that’s The Walking Dead. Man alive (or dead, I suppose), who would’ve thought a zombie-based show could be so compelling. I hear that Zombieland is getting a pilot/season too, which should be fun. But TWD is such a good show, even in its third season and getting better.

I could name a slew of other great shows that are still running but a little on fumes, if I’m honest. I always loved (and still do, like an old teddy bear with one eye missing and its stuffing coming out) Sons of Anarchy but I’m not desperate to see it each week like I was. The Killing is another example of a show that had a great opening season (if a little teasing at the end) that really didn’t pick up much (if at all) in its second outing.

So, to the future then. Revolution? Hmm, not sure – a bit like Last Resort, I have a feeling this will end up being ephemeral pap. That Shield show I keep hearing about? Dunno, super hero type stuff does tend to struggle a bit and how on earth can it match up to Avengers? Da Vinci’s Demons? Looks like it might be cool, I suspect it’ll just be a Spartacus clone (oh, and I should really mention Spartacus as an enjoyable romp. Loved Vengeance and I’m enjoying War of the Damned but glad this is the last season).

It could be the fact I’m feeling grumpy because my back aches and I haven’t drunk enough coffee this morning, or it could be that TV land needs some fresh ideas and less conservative, lowest common denominator money men to help make it happen. Oh, and no more f**king vampire shows, please. Every time I see an advert for Twilight and the final chapter in that heinous movie franchise and think about the lagoon of crap it has deposited on the world because of its very presence, I shed a little tear of pain and anger. It’s very confusing. :(


Jan 27 2013

Rewrites

Been thinking about rewrites today and that most cardinal of writerly sins, the persistent editor.

For the uninformed or uninitiated, the persistent editor is that little voice in a writer's head that keeps telling him or her to just go back over that last sentence, just take another look at that paragraph, it's just not quite perfect yet.

That's the thing about perfection, it's not possible. It's an unreachable ideal that we can strive to get as close to as possible but not actually achieve, not in this at least (perfect scores in ten-pin bowling/snooker etc don't count for the purposes of this discussion).

It's dangerous that little voice, it's the one that gets in the way of making progress (i.e. getting words down). You listen too much and before you know it you're brushing up against your deadline and you've got 500 words of that 100k novel in the bank. Bad times.

Editing, especially self editing, is a vital part of the writing process though. To ignore it and leave it to your editor is just unprofessional and, let's face it, just plain lazy.

Balance is essential, just the right amount of self editing to get down some solid and robust prose that stands up to the editorial pen without fear of a full scale new draft, but not so much that you paralyse essential progress on your novel.

As a commissioning editor myself, I can't do a damn thing with 500 words of excellent prose. It's worthless to me. A full novel, sensibly self edited but in need of some editorial massage, that I can work with.

So, like I said, my mind's been on rewrites today. I've been working on the latest novel (Vulkan Lives) and whilst I had a great today yesterday, clocking in about 3k of decent material I was happy with, today it wasn't so great. I made some progress, about 1k, but got to the end of a section (the last piece I worked on) and realised I had to throw it out. I junked 500 words, just threw it out. It was liberating, annoying too. To put it in context, I pretty much spent the whole day reworking existing scenes and reordering material. Something wasn't working on a fundamental level and rather than plough on in blissful ignorance, I needed to do something about it.

I should have seen it coming. Some days you get the words in (and any writer who doesn't rate their progress by word count isn't doing it right in my opinion; either that or they don't hit too many deadlines or being in projects to spec – as a writer of tie-in fiction that's kind of important) and some days you spend working on structure.

It's a living, breathing, constantly shifting thing a story. Sometimes it needs attention in order to wrestle it back under control or you end up with one of those, bloated, god awful, meandering pieces of crap erroneously labelled as fiction.

Rewrites and self editing are important parts of the process, so is producing your word count. Balancing both is the key to happiness in my opinion, as is the acceptance of the fact that you can't get away from doing either and have to make them work for you.


Jan 19 2013

Answers!

Having given it a week or so, I figured it was about time I posted some answers to all the questions posed to me as a result of the previous posting. Nosy lot, aren’t you? Ha, ha – just kidding. Thanks for the great response, and I shall do my best to answer everything asked as fully as I can.

Okay then without further ado, here goes:

Q. When does the first book in the Circle of Fire trilogy get released? Does it have a title yet?

It’s still to be confirmed, especially as I’ve been slated to write two novels and a novella beforehand, but I plan to start writing Circle of Fire end of 2013/beginning of 2014 so that could be a late 2014 or early-mid 2015 release. Also yet to be confirmed, but my working title for book one is ‘Rebirth’.

Q. Vulkan Lives. Other than the obvious, what can we expect from this?

Without giving the story away, it’s a two pronged narrative in which a double storyline interweaves with the other. It features several primarchs, most prominently Vulkan and Konrad Kurze, and as such the story examines the relationship between these two characters, chipping away at the psyche of both. There’s the return of some classic characters from the series (not all mine, it has to be said) and very little of the story itself is set on Isstvan V, although the resonance of what happened there does inform e narrative to a large degree. ‘Vulkan Lives’, ‘Scorched Earth’ and ‘Promethean Sun’ all connect. And my final little reveal is that this novel leads in to Dan’s ‘Unremebered Empire’, which directly follows it on the schedule and sets up a major story thread in that book.

Q. Have you given any thought to some sort of a sequel to Fall of Damnos? Any chance of returning to Sicarius and Co?

That’s a definite. Although ‘Fall of Damnos’ was the story I wanted to tell and fulfilled its remit as describing a Space Marine Battle, it always niggled me a bit that there was no time or room to describe the desperate evacuation of the planet and the sacrifices the Second Company had to make when they did so. A return to Damnos is on the cards for the near future.

Q. After The Great Betrayal, what’s your next fantasy project?

That’s an easy one. For my next Warhammer novel, I’ll be returning to the War of Vengeance and following hot on the heels of ‘Master of Dragons’ by Chris Wraight with the third book in the series, currently titled ‘Elfdoom’.


Q. How do you come up with the names for your characters in the Tome of Fire trilogy? As which languages are the source?

I guessed asked this one quite a lot. The simple answer is: I just make them up. Basically, when I was about to write ‘Salamander’ I wanted to find a base I could build the culture around. As the Salamanders and the Nocturneans they live alongside are a tribal culture, I opted for an African naming convention and simply applied my search engine to the task. Knowing the lead characters in advance (I also researched African actors so I could put names to faces and still have their head shots on my old PC to remind me), I went down a massive alphabetical list and selected names that evoked the sense of the character then I 40k’d them up a bit by adding -ON or -EN or -US etc as a suffix to the name. I also plundered Ancient Greek and Roman names, anything from the Classical World, reasoning that the Salamanders Legion originated on Terra and as such they would still have Terran names in some instances. This is where I got characters such as Elysius and Iagon from (although the latter is simply a corruption of the character Iago from ‘Othello’ and was a deliberate homage). Use hard consonants is another technique that gave me some good, strong sounding names like the hard G in Tsu’gan or the hard K in Ba’ken. These characters wouldn’t have had the same resonance, I think, if I’d have opted for lighter consonants or combinations of consonants like TH or S. To my mind, it makes these characters more grounded and earthy, which is precisely what I was going for.

Q. How do you balance between being an editor and a writer? As in when you’re writing does the editor part of you come into the writing process with a greater authority than other writers who are not editors?

It’s that old answer of perfecting the art of wearing two hats. Although, I’d argue that most writers (if not all) have an editor in them, so it’s all part of the same beast. I think the challenge comes when you’re writing that you don’t self edit too soon or too often. I know a lot of writers who get hung up on every little detail, every word and sentence as they are writing and can’t move on to the next one until it’s perfect. This is a good way to drive yourself around the bend and miss deadlines because you’re over obsessing and allowing your internal editor to drive the writer. Best practice for me is to get the words down, the ideas out of my head and committed to the screen and then, when I start the next writing session, read my previous work and do a little editing. I know that I might revisit this passage or chapter several times throughout the writing of the book but that in tackling the edits this way I am still making progress and finessing as I go.

Q. How do you log an idea for yourself? I’m not a writer but often find my mind wondering and get an idea for a cool story, I think about how I should get that down somehow and then quite often I forget and then the idea passes and is lost… I assume this would happen even more for a writer!

Several ways. I have multiple note books of varying degrees of size that I jot ideas, synopses, even entire chapter breakdowns in as sometimes ‘going old skool’ is more conducive to creativity. I also use notes and notepad a lot on my iPad, which has the added advantage that I can email them, and cut and paste my notes directly into Pages or Word to form the basis on a synopsis or pitch etc. My advice: keep a pen and notepad on you at all times!

Q. Are you able to switch off the editor inside and enjoy reading? Are you reading anything for yourself at the moment?

Definitely. I actually don’t find the transition that hard as what I tend to read for pleasure is quite different from what I edit/read for my job (athough that is also a pleasure, just in a different way). Subconsciously, I am always analysing I think. I’m not sure any writer can read without doing this, logging the really nice turns of phrase or trying to figure out what a writer did to create a certain mood or emotional reaction, the way they structured their most memorable and striking characters etc. But, yes, I still enjoy reading. Very much. I’m reading John Connolly’s latest thriller at the moment, ‘Wrath of Angels’, which is excellent (if you scroll down to the bottom of the blog in the Culture Shocks section, I regularly update what I’m reading, gaming, writing, listening to etc). I’ve also got Scott Synder’s ‘Vodoo Heart’ and Danie Ware’s ‘Ecko Rising’ on my read next list/pile.

Q. Do you have a favourite Non-Superhero related comicbook series that you have read?

I don’t actually. All the comic book stuff I read is super hero-based. I am loving Scott Synder’s run on Batman and have been picking up that, the Death of the Family tie-ins and Geoff Johns run on Aquaman, as well as Justice League. I’ve got a few Marvel Now titles, including X-Men and Avengers but have yet to read them, they’re just on my iPad. I ‘enjoyed’ Preacher a few years back, which I suppose is non-super hero (though there are forces and beings in that which have powers not unlike super heroes) and I’ve read a bit of ‘The Boys’, which subverts (and perverts in some instances) the super hero genre. Any recommendations?

Q. Any news of a Salamander Omnibus and perhaps with maps and extra stuff?

An omnibus is on the cards. I’m keen for it not to include everything I’ve done thus far, but it will have the three novels and the stories that tie in directly to the Tome of Fire, so there’ll be some hold-overs from ‘Tome of Fire’, the anthology (but not all) and I want to write a long short story that pre-figures ‘Fires of War’ too. Current working title in my head for that is ‘Dragonborn’. I’d also like to include a Nocturne map and a glossary of names and terms, perhaps even a timeline that shows where the events sit in the 40k chronology.

Q. Vulkan lives : As the author can you choose, or decide what will be on the cover? (I hope of an official draw of Vulkan , even if I think he’s the more diffcult to be done.)

For the ‘Vulkan Lives’ cover I was very lucky in that Black Library has an incredible artist in the form of Neil Roberts who does all the cover work. Like with ‘Scorched Earth’, Neil and I discussed what should be on the cover, what scene it would depict and how it would interact with ‘Scorched Earth’ too, which is really a companion piece to the novel. There will be an illustration of Vulkan (the first ever, I believe). In fact, it’s already done and can say that it’s amazing.

Q. Can you talk about working with other author and using their stuff in your story? In the same way what’s your feelings when they use your material? Have you ever told to a collegue that he has a wrong viewpoint on your stuff?

As the Horus Heresy and, to a lesser extent, the 40k setting is a shared universe there are a lot of occasions when authors will be using the same characters, running with ideas set up by someone else in order to keep the story going. Until recently, I’ve not used characters created by other authors before, but I have written stories about Chapters (Ultramarines, spring to mind). In the case of characters, there’s an inherent pressure that you don’t want to undermine what another author has written and stay true to how they have potrayed a certain character, but you also don’t want to feel so inhibited that you can’t develop them and add to them. Research and the right amount of respect is important here, as well as regular communication and full disclosure to the other writer. Ultimately, it’s the call of the publisher who does what, with whom and when, but good working relationships and professionalism is predicated on courtesy I think. It’s certainly a fun challenge, but I think, ultimately, I prefer to use my own characters and work with the strands and story threads that I’ve developed personally. Fortunately, I work with an extremely talented and professional group of writers, so I’ve never needed to query why another author has developed one of my ideas in a way that I didn’t agree with.


Q. Finally what about working with your translator in foreign language? Especially the French translator.

I actually don’t get to interact with my translators much, which is a shame, as most of this is handled by Black Library’s French editor. I was fortunate enough to meet my translators recently at French GD and we were able to chat a little bit about their work, but contact is usually confined to the odd emailed question about a particular term or ocassionally my intent in a certain sentence or passage of text.

Q. Have you thought of doing a story ( or short ) on bray’arth ashmantle? He is a 1 of a kind dreadnaught, who got lost for 9 days…I think that’s more than enough time for stuff to go down and some really sick action to occur.

He’d be a great character to write about. I did pen a synopsis for a story involving Bray’arth but decided to shelve it for later, so I might revisit it at some point in the future.

Q. Are you wanting the new Rocksteady Batman game to be a prequel (like they’ve rumored) or are you itching for something bigger and better ?

Ha, ha – if it’s as good as the previous two games, I honestly don’t mind. Although, something like ‘Arkham Underworld’ would be cool that incorporates the entire Gotham City.

Q. Nick, i want to ask a question. Do you plan to write and publish new story about Primarch Vulkan? Prometean Sun was excellent, and can’t wait for new Vulkan stories :)

I sure do. Check out the first answer regards ‘Vulkan Lives’… (I’ve also already written another novella called ‘Scorched Earth’ too – Vulkan’s not it, but he’s an important presense in the story).

Q. Recently, I reread The Burning. And I wondered if N’Bel is ‘Vulkan’s N’Bel’ or just a guy named that way. And, is the Metalshaper in that story Vulkan? I could never decide.

Ah, ‘The Burning’. Well, this is of course a story about Dak’ir’s vision quest, his trial to see if he can control his newfound psychic powers, so a lot of what he sees and experiences is impression and the product of his subconscious mind. I can say that N’bel is Vulkan’s N’bel, his father but that the identity of the metal-shaper shall remain a mystery. What do you think? I take it you figured out the drygnirr was Pyriel?


Q. In your HH writing, will we ever see Vulkan wielding/planning/making/thinking about his relics? Or the Tome of Fire?

Possibly and yes.

Q.  Can you tell us about Vulkan Lives a wee bit more please?

See above…

Q. Any idea when the first Circle of Fire novel will be out?

Same with this one…

Q. What is Ignea? Where is it? In what way are the Igneans different from the ‘normal’ Nocturneans? It seems Dak’ir is lighter skinned than the inhabitants of the Sanctuary Cities, is that because the Igneans are ethnically different?

Ignea is an underground realm of caves that runs throughout much of Nocturne. Given the planet’s volatile nature, areas of this vast cave system are periodically uninhabitable, hence the nomadic nature of Igneans. Dak’ir’s skin is lighter because he is not exposed to the sun like the Nocturneans that live above ground in the Sanctuary Cities, and, yes, Igneans are ethnically different, just as Nocturneans from the various Sanctuary Cities are too.

Q. I’ve been wondering about that for really long: what’s with the apostrophes in some of the Nocturnean names? Do they signify a sound like a glottal stop, or… (I’m probably over-thinking that.)

Also, more importantly, is Dak’ir Sailor Nocturne? ;)

It’s partly affectation and because a lot of African root names have apostrophe’s in them so it helped convey the sense of tribal culture I was aiming for. The apostrophe’s are also intended to show where the emphasis of certain letters are in the Salamander’s names (but aren’t intended as a glottal stop). For instance, ‘Dak’ir’ is pronounced, ‘Dak-eer’ with a hard letter K and ‘Ba’ken’, ‘Ba-ken’ with a short A and a hard K. ‘Tsu’gan’ is ‘Soo-gan’ with a silent T, long U and a hard G. The apostrophes are really there to reinforce and aid with pronunciation.

As for the sailor thing… huh?

Okay, that’s everything. I hope that answers some of your questions and provides a little insight into my thoughts and ideas regards my work and the subjects thereof.